The petitioner sought cancellation of respondent no. 8's brick kiln license, claiming an official direction from 2014 to stop manufacturing. The court dismissed the writ petition as misconceived and ill-advised.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3290 of 2018
======================================================
Sudhir Kumar Srivastava Son of Late Brij Kishore Srivastava, Resident of Village-Bhatkan Khem, P.O.-Narinpur, P.S.-Ander, District-Siwan, at Present Resident of Mohalla-Shukla Toli, P.S.-Siwan Town, District-Siwan.
... ... Petitioner/s
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Gyan Prakash Ojha, GA 7 For the Mines Dept. : Mr. Utsav Anand, JC to Spl. P.P. Mines ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER
petitioner and Mr. Utsav Anand, learned J.C. to Spl. P.P. Mines.
The petitioner has approached this Court for cancelling the license of the brick kiln of the respondent no. 8.
It is the contention of the learned Counsel for the petitioner that in 2014 itself, to be precise on 13.10.2014 (letter no. 452), the Mining Development Officer, Chapra cum Mining Inspector, Siwan had directed the petitioner to stop
Patna High Court CWJC No.3290 of 2018(2) dt.10-08-2023 2/2
manufacturing of brick kiln till he gets letter from it as also after the environmental clearance.
If the direction of the State official is not being carried out, they are competent enough to get it executed and don’t need the shoulder of the petitioner to use their guns.
The writ petition is misconceived, ill advised and is accordingly dismissed.
(Rajiv Roy, J)
Neha/-
U
Sudhir Kumar Srivastava
M/s Vikash EET Udyog through its Proprietor Vinod Singh
Rajiv Roy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
