The Patna High Court, in an oral order, amended the writ petition, the petitioner withdrew the application, and the court dismissed the petition on those terms.
Permission to withdraw the application was accorded; the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2135 of 2019
In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16114 of 2017
======================================================
The Bihar State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
Sharda Rice Mill
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Utkarsh Utpal, Advocate Mr.Shailendra Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.S. Raza Ahmad (AAG- 5) ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER
3 01-08-2023
Mr. Utkarsh Utpal, learned counsel on instruction of Mr. Shailendra Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits seeks permission to withdraw the present application.
Permission accorded.
Accordingly, the petition stands dismissed as
withdrawn.
(Rajiv Roy, J)
Jagdish/Jyoti/-
U
The Bihar State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd.
Sharda Rice Mill
Rajiv Roy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
