Ramballabh Ray v. The State of Bihar
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition was withdrawn by the counsel for the petitioner on application. The court permitted the withdrawal and dismissed the petition accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5166 of 2020
======================================================
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Yogendra Pd. Sinha, AAG 7
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
ORAL ORDER
2 01-08-2023 Mr. Sunil Kumar, learned Counsel for the petitioners
submit that he may be permitted to withdraw the petition.
Permission accorded.
The writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.
(Rajiv Roy, J)
Neha/-
U
Ramballabh Ray
The State of Bihar
Rajiv Roy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court