Petitioners sought withdrawal of a writ petition concerning panchayat election matters, counsel stating the matter had become infructuous. The court permitted withdrawal and disposed of the petition without any substantive adjudication or relief.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2667 of 2020
======================================================
Patna High Court CWJC No.2667 of 2020(4) dt.01-08-2023 2/3
... ... Petitioner/s
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Ms. Ritika Rani, Advocate Ms. Rupali, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. P.K. Verma (AAG-3) For the State Election Commission : Mr. Sanjeev Nikesh, Advocate Mr. Girish Pandey, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER
4 01-08-2023
Patna High Court CWJC No.2667 of 2020(4) dt.01-08-2023 3/3
Permission Accorded.
Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of.
(Rajiv Roy, J)
kiran/-
U
Archana Kumari
Rahul Kumar
Sweety Kumari
Puja Bharti
Sikandar Choudhary
The State of Bihar
Rajiv Roy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
