Application dismissed for non-prosecution on one day's absence; court set aside the dismissal order and directed the court below to decide the pending application within a month.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION No.153 of 2020
======================================================
Hafij Mohammad Humayun Akhtar @ H.M. Hamayun Akhtar, Son of Md. Nasim Akhtar Siddique, Resident of Mohalla- Bharaopar, P.S.- Murarpur, District- Nalanda, At present residing at Mohalla- Kohna Sarai, Ward No. 40, P.S. Biharsharif, District- Nalanda.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Hansraj For the Respondent/s : Mr.Nikesh Kumar ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER
3 14-09-2023
In view of the office note dated 12.09.2023, the
service of notice is validly against all respondents.
Patna High Court C.Misc. No.153 of 2020(3) dt.14-09-2023 2/2
may be heard by the court below on his application dated 22.05.2004. The application dated 22.05.2004 must be decided
by the court below within a month from the date of communication of this order.
(Sandeep Kumar, J)
Ranjeet/-
U
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the dismissal for non-prosecution of the petitioner's application should be set aside and the application reconsidered by the court below.
Hafij Mohammad Humayun Akhtar @ H.M. Hamayun Akhtar
Zila Parishad, Nalanda through Braj Raj Kishore
Md. Talha
Md. Tarik Anwar
Sandeep Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
