Petitioner withdrew the criminal miscellaneous application against the order taking cognizance. The Court dismissed the application as withdrawn while granting liberty to raise grounds later, referring Kanchan Kumar case.
Application dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to petitioner to raise all grounds at the stage of framing of charge.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16080 of 2016
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-130 Year-2015 Thana- NATHNAGAR District- Bhagalpur
======================================================
Vishnu Sah son of Prakash Sah, resident of Mohalla- Noorpur, P.S.- Madhusudanpur Nathnagar, District- Bhagalpur.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Manoj Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s: Mr.Sucheta Yadavapp ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16080 of 2016(3) dt.13-09-2023 2/2
by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Kanchan Kumar
Vs. State of Bihar (2022) 9 SCC 577.
(Sandeep Kumar, J)
Sunnykr/-
U T
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Kanchan Kumar Vs. State of BiharReferred¶19
Kanchan Kumar Vs. State of Bihar (2022) 9 SCC 577 · Who else cites this
Vishnu Sah
State Of Bihar
Suresh Prasad Sah
Sandeep Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
