Criminal Miscellaneous application filed for quashing an order taking cognizance under Section 302 IPC was dismissed as no interference was made out.
The application for quashing was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15680 of 2016
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-342 Year-2013 Thana- NAUTAN District- West Champaran
======================================================
Raju Dubey Son of Sita Ram Dubey, Resident of Village-Jhakhara, P.S.Jagdishpur, District-West Champaran.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State Of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sanjay Kumar No.-7, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.S.Dayal, APP ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER
3 13-09-2023
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
APP for the State.
2. This application has been filed for quashing of the impugned order dated 08.01.2016 passed by learned C.J.M, West Champaran at Bettiah in connection with Nautan Jagdishpur P.S. Case No. 342 of 2013 by which learned Magistrate has taken cognizance against the petitioner for the offences under Sections 302, 120B, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. There is serious allegation levelled against the petitioner to have killed the deceased.
4. In these circumstances, no interference is made out against the impugned order 08.01.2016 passed by learned C.J.M, West Champaran at Bettiah in connection with Nautan
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15680 of 2016(3) dt.13-09-2023 2/2
Jagdishpur P.S. Case No. 342 of 2013. Accordingly, this application is dismissed.
(Sandeep Kumar, J)
Harsh/
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere with the impugned order taking cognizance against the petitioner.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Raju Dubey
The State Of Bihar
Sandeep Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
