Petitioner challenged an order regarding employment/retirement benefits. Counsel stated grievance was redressed via counter affidavit, rendering writ infructuous. Court dismissed the application as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9687 of 2015
======================================================
Ram Narain Sahu Son of Laxmi Sahu resident of village Dhabahi, Post Dhabahi, Prakhand Laukahi, P.S. Laukahi, District- Madhubani, presently posted as an Assistant Teacher in Government Middle School, Fulkahi, Block Phulparas, District- Madhubani.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Ms. Neha Kumari Giri, Adv. Mr. Jitendra Kumar Giri For the Respondent/s : Mr. M. Nasrul Huda Khan, SC-1 ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER
Ms. Neha Kumari Giri, learned counsel appearing for
the petitioner submits that in view of the statement made in paragraph-10 of the counter affidavit, the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed. As such, this writ application has become infructuous.
In view of the aforesaid, this writ application is dismissed as infructuous.
praful/-
(Anil Kumar Sinha, J)
U
Ram Narain Sahu
State Of Bihar
Anil Kumar Sinha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
