Petitioner sought permission to withdraw her writ petition to appeal to a Revisional Authority. The High Court dismissed the application as withdrawn with liberty to agitate cause elsewhere.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 5182 of 2020
Mamta Kumari, aged about 32 years, (Female) wife of Mukesh Kumar, resident of village Kumarpur, Ward No. 3, Police Station- Bihariganj, DistrictMadhepura.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Santosh Kumar, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr.Arvind Ujjwal (SC4) ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR
and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
ORAL ORDER
learned advocate for the petitioner, seeks permission to
withdraw this application in order to agitate his cause before the Revisional Authority.
Patna High Court CWJC No. 5182 of 2020(3) dt.13-01-2023 2/2
Dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty
aforesaid.
(Ashutosh Kumar, J)
( Satyavrat Verma, J)
rishabh/rishi
U
Mamta Kumari
The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Food and Consumer Protection Department, Government of Bihar, Patna
The District Magistrate, Madhepura
The District Supply Officer, Madhepura
The Sub-Divisional Officer, Udakishunganj, District- Madhepura
The Block Supply Officer, Udakishunganj, District- Madhepura
Ashutosh Kumar
Satyavrat Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
