The High Court at Patna found a writ petition concerning electoral matters to be infructuous with the passage of time and disposed of the petition accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4945 of 2020
======================================================
Vikash Kumar, Son of Shankar Prasad@ Shankar Prasad Maurya Resident of Village and P.O.- Labhri, P.S.- Mairwa and the District- Siwan.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arvind Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Uday Shankar Saran Singh (GP-19) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER
Patna High Court CWJC No.4945 of 2020(2) dt.02-08-2023 2/2
2 02-08-2023 Heard the parties.
It seems that with the passage of time, the matter has
now become infructuous.
Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of.
(Rajiv Roy, J)
kiran/-
U
Vikash Kumar
The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna
The Commissioner, the Bihar State Election Commission, Virchand Patel Path, Patna
The District Magistrate, District- Siwan
The Block Development Officer-cum-PACS Election Officer at Mairwa Block
Krishnanand Divedi
Rajiv Roy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
