Remanded

Mahesh Pandey v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC6 Nov 2023CWJC/4793/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner challenging illegal agreement by respondent no.5 regarding his land, allowed. Court disposed of writ disposing of matter by directing petitioner to file representation with District Magistrate within six weeks along with relevant documents.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to file representation before Respondent No. 2 along with relevant documents within six weeks for disposal after hearing parties.

Mahesh Pandey Vs The State of Bihar — Municipal and Town Planning | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4793 of 2020

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Mahesh Pandey Son of Late Suryadeo Pandey Resident of Village-Manika, P.S.-Mushahari, District-Muzaffarpur

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar.

¶7

The District Magistrate, Muzaffarpur.

¶8

The Sub Divisional Officer, East Muzaffarpur.

¶9

The Circle Officer, Block Mushhari, Muzaffarpur

¶10

Arvind Kumar Singh @ Vijay Singh Son of Late Chandeo Prasad Singh Resident of Village- Manika Bishunpur Chand, P.S,.-Mushahari, DistrictMuzaffarpur.

¶11

... ... Respondent/s

¶12

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Alok Kumar Alok, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Sajid Slaim Khan (Sc25) ======================================================

¶13

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH

¶14

ORAL ORDER

¶15

3 06-11-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the

¶16

State.

¶17

This writ petition has been filed to direct the respondent to take appropriate action against the respondent no.5 who have illegally entered into agreement with Annu Infrastructure Private Ltd company with respect to the land of the petitioner and has issued no objecting certificate handing over the land to the Annu Infrastructure Private Ltd. in an illegal manner allowing the later to set up plant over it without any authority of law .

¶18

3 . In the facts and circumstances of the case , writ

¶19

Patna High Court CWJC No.4793 of 2020(3) dt.06-11-2023 2/2

¶20

petition is disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to file a representation before The District Magistrate, Muzaffarpur (respondent No. 2) along with all the relevant documents in support of the claim, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of this order.

¶21

In the event, such representation is filed before respondent No. 2 (The District Magistrate, Muzaffarpur), the same shall be to dispose of in accordance with law after hearing all the parties preferably within a further period of six months from the date of receipt of the representation .

¶22

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)

¶23

Koushik/-

¶24

Mahesh Pandey v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mahesh Pandey v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sunil Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Abrre Alam @ Abre Alam Vs The State of Bihar

Dilip Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Sukhu Saw Vs The State of Bihar

Dadan Upadhyay Vs The State of Bihar

Ram Sevak Mukhiya Vs The State of Bihar