Dilip Kumar v. The State of Bihar
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition filed regarding land record mutation and rent. Court directed Circle Officer to dispose of petitioners representation within three months.
What did the court decide?
Direction to respondent No. 8 to dispose of the representation within three months after hearing parties
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4184 of 2022
======================================================
- Dilip Kumar S/o Late Sahaj Narayan Thakur, R/o Village- Pupari, Ward No. 6, P.S. and Dist.- Sitamarhi.
- Ram Akwal Thakur @ Ram Ekbal Thakur, Son of Late Sukhdeo Thakur, R/o Village- Pupari, Ward No. 6, P.S. and Dist.- Sitamarhi.
- Chandra Bhushan Kumar, Son of Ram Ekbal Thakur @ Ram Akwal Thakur, R/o Village- Pupari, Ward No. 6, P.S. and Dist.- Sitamarhi.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
- The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue and Land Reforms, Govt. of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna.
- The Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue and Land Reforms, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
- The Director, Land Reforms and Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
- The Joint Director, Land Reforms and Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Dilip Kumar S/o Late Sahaj Narayan Thakur
- petitioner
Ram Akwal Thakur
- petitioner
Chandra Bhushan Kumar
- respondent
The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue and Land Reforms
- respondent
Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue and Land Reforms
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court