High Court rejected petitioner's bail petition during trial stage but directed trial court to conclude case within six months due to prolonged custody.
Bail prayer rejected; trial expedited within six months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10702 of 2023
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-190 Year-2019 Thana- HUSSAINGANJ District- Siwan
======================================================
ABRRE ALAM @ ABRE ALAM Son of Late Gafar Miyan R/o Piyaur, P.sHussainganj, (M.H. Nagar) Dist- Siwan
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Krishna Prasad Singh, Sr.Adv. Mr.Ravindra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Jagdhar Prasad Mr.Bijay Prakash ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER
7 03-11-2023
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, State and
informant.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10702 of 2023(7) dt.03-11-2023 2/2
order.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)
anay/-
U T
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the prayer for bail of the petitioner should be allowed given the stage of trial?
Whether the trial court should be directed to conclude the trial expeditiously?
Abbre Alam @ Abre Alam
State of Bihar
Prabhat Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
