Allowed

Pushpa Kumari v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC20 Jan 2023CWJC/429/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This single-judge oral order disposed of a petition by teachers seeking salary release. The court applied directions from a prior judgment to order salary payment, interest on arrears, and penalty authority for non-compliance.

What did the court decide?

Salary and arrears to be released; interest at 9% per annum if not paid within four months; power to impose penalty of Rs. 50,000 on non-compliance.

Pushpa Kumari Vs The State of Bihar — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.429 of 2023

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Pushpa Kumari daughter of Harinandan Tiwari, Residing at Village- P.P. Road, Buxar, P.S.- Buxar (Town), District- Buxar.

¶4

Gauri Kumari, daughter of Arjun Singh, Resident at Civil Line, Buxar, P.S.Buxar (Town) District- Buxar, presently residing at Baba Nagar, Buxar, P.S.Buxar (Town), District- Buxar.

¶5

Reena Kumari, daughter of Paras Nath Rai, Residing at Nayee Bazar, Buxar, P.S.- Buxar (Town), District- Buxar.

¶6

Mridula Kumari, daughter of Virendra Prasad, Residing at Kalab Road, Arrah, P.S. Arrah Town, District- Bhojpur.

¶7

... ... Petitioner/s

¶8

Versus

¶9

The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Bihar, Patna.

¶10

The Additional Chief Secretary, Education Department, Bihar, Patna.

¶11

The Director, Secondary Education, Education Department, Bihar, Patna.

¶12

The then District School Inspectress, Bhojpur-cum- Buxar (Now the post has abolished).

¶13

The District Education Officer, Buxar.

¶14

The District Programme Officer (Establishment), Buxar.

¶15

The Deputy School Inspectress, Buxar.

¶16

The Head Mistress, Government D.K. Girl Middle School, Buxar.

¶17

... ... Respondent/s

¶18

======================================================

¶19

Appearance :

¶20

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rana Ishwar Chandra, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Prabhakar Jha, GP 27

¶21

======================================================

¶22

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA ORAL ORDER

¶23

2 20-01-2023 1. Heard the parties.

¶24

The petitioners pray that their salary be released.

¶25

Keeping in view the observations made by this Court

¶26

in C.W.J.C No. 22186 of 2019 (Pallavi Kumari Vs. State of

¶27

Bihar & Ors.) and analogous cases dated 29.11.2022 has held as under:-

¶28

“8. Keeping in view above, it is directed that the

¶29

Patna High Court CWJC No.429 of 2023(2) dt.20-01-2023 2/3

¶30

salary of the teachers shall not be withheld on excuses as above and arrears of salary shall also be released. Fund in this regard shall be made available by the Education Department to the concerned employment units for the purpose of payment. It is made clear that if the arrears are not released within a stipulated period of four months from today, the teachers would be entitled to receive interest on the arrears of the amount of salary at the rate of nine per cent. The interest amount shall be recoverable from the respective District Education Officers/ District Programme Establishment Officer.

¶31

9. If the salary/arrears of salary are not released, the concerned teacher would also be entitled to file an appeal before the respective District Appellate Authority. If such an appeal is preferred, the same shall be decided expeditiously within a period of three months. If required, the District Appellate Authority/State Appellate Authority would be also empowered to impose penalty in terms of Rule 16 of the Rules of 2020 which provides as under:

¶32

“ 16. Power to impose Punishment:-

¶33

In case of non-compliance of the

¶34

order/direction or in case of any complaints by the party for compliance of the order:-

¶35

(i) The Appellate Authority shall impose

¶36

Patna High Court CWJC No.429 of 2023(2) dt.20-01-2023

¶37

3/3

¶38

punishment against-concerned party but he will be given adequate opportunity of hearing before imposing punishment.

¶39

(ii) The Appellate Authority may impose penalty upto Rs. 50,000/- (Fifty thousand only) upon the answerable party. The amount of penalty shall be deposited in the Treasury under the head indicated by the Department. The amount of penalty shall be recoverable by way of Public demand.

¶40

(iii) The Appellate Authority shall have jurisdiction to make recommendation to the concerned Department to initiate Departmental proceeding or to take necessary action against the delinquent employee under the provisions of Bihar Service Code/Bihar Panchayat Raj Act 2006/Bihar Municipal Act 2007 and other relevant provisions.”

¶41

Keeping in view above, the same directions are

¶42

held to be applicable in the present case mutatis mutandis .

¶43

The writ petition is disposed of accordingly.

¶44

(Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, J)

¶45

Suraj/Item No. 52

¶46

Pushpa Kumari v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pushpa Kumari v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sagar Das Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Kanhaiya Deyal Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Ashok Kumar Sinha Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Sachchi Kumari Vs The State of Bihar

Akshyabar Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Sushila Kumari Vs The State of Bihar