The High Court of Patna dismissed the filed writ petition, stating that the learned counsel could not be contacted in spite of repeated attempts to reach the client.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18445 of 2013
======================================================
Kanhaiya Deyal Son Of Late Jamuna Prasad Resident Of Village - Chanchaur Gabrapur, Police Station Civil Lines, Gaya, District - Gaya
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Jitendra Prasad Singh, Adv. Ms. Sripriya Sinha, Adv. Mr. Rajeev Kumar, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Narendra Kumar Singh, AC to GP-32 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA
ORAL ORDER
has not been able to contact his client in spite of repeated attempts.
The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
(Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, J)
amit/-
Item no.11
U
Kanhaiya Deyal
The State Of Bihar
District Magistrate, Gaya
Sub - Divisional Magistrate, Gaya
Senior Deputy Collector Sherghati
Deputy Collector, Establishment, Gaya
Sanjeev Prakash Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
