The High Court of Patna dismissed the writ petition as having become infructuous.
The writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18638 of 2013
======================================================
Ashok Kumar Sinha S/O Kartik Prasad Resident Of Baidhya Nath Dham, Deoghar, District- Santhal Pargana.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ramendra Nath Mukhopadhaya, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Lalit Kishore, PAAG ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA
ORAL ORDER
writ petition has been rendered infructuous.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as having
become infructuous.
(Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, J)
Brajesh Kumar/-
U
Ashok Kumar Sinha
The State Of Bihar and Ors
Sanjeev Prakash Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
