The writ petition was dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner did not appear in court despite respondent counsel being present.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.22194 of 2018
======================================================
Md. Salim @ Md. Khalifa Son of Md. Lagan Resident of Village- Chak Mahmuda, Police Station- Maharajganj, District- Siwan.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : None For the Respondent/s : Mr. Rishi Raj Sinha- Sc19
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER
3 04-05-2023 Heard learned counsel for the State and learned
counsel for the Wakf Board.
No one appears on behalf of the petitioner.
Learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for
the Wakf Board are present.
The case is dismissed for non-prosecution.
(Satyavrat Verma, J)
GauravSinha/-
U
Md. Salim @ Md. Khalifa
State Of Bihar
District Magistrate, Siwan
Deputy Collector Land Reforms, Maharajganj, Siwan
Chief Executive Officer, Bihar State Shia Wakf Board
Satyavrat Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
