Hon'ble Justice Satyavrat Verma accorded permission to the petitioner to withdraw the writ application, stating that the application has become infructuous due to the efflux of time.
Permission to withdraw the writ application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.22177 of 2018 In
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION No.142 of 2018
======================================================
Ram Binay Paswan
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
Ravi Kumar and Ors
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Devendra Kumar For the Respondent/s : Mr. Gyan Prakash Ojha GA-7 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER
4 04-05-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that by efflux of time the writ application has become infructuous and thus, seeks permission to withdraw the writ application.
Permission is accorded.
(Satyavrat Verma, J)
Ayush/Rishabh
U
Ram Binay Paswan
Ravi Kumar and Ors
Satyavrat Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
