The High Court at Patna granted permission to the petitioners to withdraw a modification application and accordingly rejected the same in this oral order.
Permission to withdraw the modification application was granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22309 of 2023
In
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.51793 of 2022
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-68 Year-2022 Thana- AGIAON BAZAR District- Bhojpur
======================================================
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pramod Kumar Mallick For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Meena Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER
The learned counsel for the petitioners after some arguments realizing his difficulties, seeks permission to withdraw the present modification application.
Permission is accorded.
Accordingly, the present modification application is
rejected.
(Satyavrat Verma, J)
Adnan/-
U T
Ranjan Paswan
Dinesh Yadav
The State of Bihar
Satyavrat Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
