Disposed

Kamal Kishor Sharma v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC27 Mar 2023CWJC/19224/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court granted liberty to the petitioner to approach the Circle Officer under the Bihar Public Land Encroachment Act, 1956, and disposed of the writ petition on those terms without adjudicating the merits of the claim regarding encroachment and land title.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to approach the Circle Officer under the Bihar Public Land Encroachment Act, 1956 within four weeks; writ petition disposed on those terms.

Kamal Kishor Sharma Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors. — Land Acquisition | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19224 of 2015

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Kamal Kishor Sharma son of Hari Nath Sharma resident of Village - Gajachak Muhammadpur, P.S. - Janipur, District - Patna.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar

¶7

The District Magistrate, Patna. 3. The Circle Officer, Phulwarisharif, Patna.

¶8

... ... Respondent/s

¶9

======================================================

¶10

Appearance :

¶11

For the Petitioner/s : Dr. Kislay, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Kamlesh Kishore, AC to Standing Counsel-12

¶12

======================================================

¶13

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER

¶14

2 27-03-2023 The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following reliefs:-

¶15

“1(ii) For issuance of writ /order/direction in the nature of 'writ of mandamus' commanding the respondents to release the land in question which is Bihar Sarkar Gali as mentioned in the Khatiyan and map and now mostly blocked and abstracting the egress / ingress due to illegal encroachment and it is the Gali which is the only Rasta to the Petitioner's house.

¶16

(ii) For issuance of appropriate declaration that the action of the respondents concerned in not removing encroachment in question is highly illegal, arbitrary,

¶17

Patna High Court CWJC No.19224 of 2015(2) dt.27-03-2023 2/3

¶18

malicious and tentamounting to violation of the Fundamental Rights, Human Rights and Natural Right of the petitioner and his family in the facts and circumstances of the case.

¶19

(ii) For issuance of appropriate declaration that the land in question is Bihar State Gaimajarua Gali land.”

¶20

At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to approach the Circle Officer, Phulwarisharif, District-Patna, for redressal of his aforesaid grievance.

¶21

Liberty so sought is granted.

¶22

It is needless to state that in case the petitioner approaches the Circle Officer, Phulwarisharif, District-Patna, by filing appropriate petition under the provisions of the Bihar Public Land Encroachment Act, 1956, within a period of four weeks from today, the same shall be considered, in accordance with law and after hearing the affected parties, appropriate orders shall be passed thereon, forthwith.

¶23

Patna High Court CWJC No.19224 of 2015(2) dt.27-03-2023 3/3

¶24

The writ petition stands disposed off on the

¶25

aforesaid terms.

¶26

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J)

¶27

S.Sb/Sonal-

¶28

Kamal Kishor Sharma v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kamal Kishor Sharma v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Anuradha Devi @ Anuradha Kumari @ Kumari Anuradha Vs The State of Bihar

Suresh Prasad Mandal Vs The State of Bihar

Savita Devi Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Nanda Prasad Sharma Vs The Union Of India and Anr.

Ramchandra Mallik Vs The State of Bihar

Sunita Devi Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.