Nanda Prasad Sharma v. The Union Of India and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18013 of 2015
======================================================
Nanda Prasad Sharma, Son of Late Jaygobind Prasad Sharma, resident of Barbatta in front of Block No.124 and 126 P.S. Sonepur, Dist-Saran.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.The Union of India through Divisional Railway Manager, E.C. Railway, Sonepur, Saran. 2.Senior Divisional Engineer, E.C. Railway, Sonepur, Saran.
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sheweta Raj,Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr.Radhika Raman,CGC Mr.Awadhesh Kumar Pandey,Sr.Panel Counsel Mr.Ram Tujabh Singh,Adv. ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER
2 27-03-2023
The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief:-
“1.That this is an application for issuance of an appropriate writ, order, direction or a writ in the nature of a Mandamus directing the Respondents not to construct boundary wall in between the Block No. 126 and 124 and further direct them to resolve the problem between the petitioner and a large numbers of persons living in the Eastern side regarding Rasta / passage between the said Block.”
At the outset, the learned counsel for the
petitioner seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the
Patna High Court CWJC No.18013 of 2015(2) dt.27-03-2023 2/2
petitioner to avail such other alternative remedies, as are otherwise available under the law, for redressal of the aforesaid grievances. Liberty so sought is granted.
The writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed.
(Mohit Kumar Shah, J)
S.Sb/sonal-
U
Nanda Prasad Sharma
Union of India
Mohit Kumar Shah
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court