Allowed

Ajit Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC18 Mar 2023CWJC/1579/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought transfer of an arms license from grandfather to himself. Appeal against DM Nawada's rejection was remanded by Divisional Commissioner Gaya in 2010 but remained undecided. Court directed the District Magistrate to pass appropriate orders within six weeks of receipt of this order.

What did the court decide?

Directing the District Magistrate, Nawada to pass appropriate orders within six weeks of receipt of this order, considering the remand order of 04.03.2010.

Ajit Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Service and Employment | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1579 of 2023

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Ajit Kumar Son of Anil Singh, Resident of Village Baurhi Kala, P.S. Rajauli, District Nawada

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Home, Bihar, Patna

¶7

The Director General of Police, Magadh Division, Gaya 3. The Superintendent of Police, Nawada 4. The Commissioner, Magadh, Division, Gaya

¶8

The District Magistrate, Nawada

¶9

... ... Respondent/s

¶10

======================================================

¶11

Appearance :

¶12

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Devendra Prasad Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr.Sheo Shankar Prasad (SC-8) : Ms.Ruchikar Jha, AC to SC-8

¶13

======================================================

¶14

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER

¶15

2 18-03-2023 The contention of the petitioner is that the petitioner

¶16

had filed an application for transfer of arms license, existing in the name of aged grandfather of the petitioner, in his name, however, the same was rejected by the District Magistrate, Nawada by an order dated 16.10.2007, which was challenged by the petitioner by filing an appeal bearing Arms Appeal No. 161 of 2008, whereupon the learned Divisional Commissioner, Magadh Division, Gaya by an order dated 04.03.2010 had set aside the order of the District Magistrate, Nawada and remanded the matter back to him, however, till date, no decision has been taken.

¶17

Patna High Court CWJC No.1579 of 2023(2) dt.18-03-2023 2/2

¶18

In view of the aforesaid, I deem it fit and proper to dispose off the present writ petition with a direction to the District Magistrate, Nawada to pass appropriate orders considering the order dated 04.03.2010, passed by the Collector, Magadh Division, Gaya, if not already passed within a period of six weeks of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

¶19

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J)

¶20

kanchan/Saurav

¶21

Ajit Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ajit Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kusheshwar Prasad @ Kusheshwar Vs the State of Bihar and Anr.

Awadhesh Rai Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Ajit Ram Vs The Union Of India and Ors.

Ram Ratan Pandit Vs The State of Bihar

Manish Anand @ Manish Anand Jha Vs The State of Bihar

Suresh Chandra Rai Vs The State of Bihar