Vinod Kumar Dubey v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution as neither petitioner nor counsel appeared despite repeated calls; no merits discussed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15118 of 2015
======================================================
Vinod Kumar Dubey S/o Baliram Dubey R/o Village Nagwan, P.S. Simri, District Buxar.
... ... Petitioner/s
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : None For the Respondent/s : Mr. Sitaram Yadav, GP-16 Yatindra Narayan, AC to GP-16 ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER
Despite repeated calls, nobody has bothered to appear
for the petitioner, hence, it appears that the petitioner has got no interest in prosecuting the present writ petition, thus, this Court has no option but to dismiss the present writ petition for want of prosecution.
Accordingly, the present writ petition stands
dismissed for non-prosecution.
(Mohit Kumar Shah, J)
Ajay/-
U
Vinod Kumar Dubey
The State Of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Village Works Department, Government of Bihar, Patna
The Principal Secretary, Village Works Department, Government of Bihar, Patna
The Executive Engineer Village Works Department, Works Division, Buxar
The Junior Engineer, Village Works Department, Works Division, Buxar
Mohit Kumar Shah
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court