Disposed

Mithlesh Singh v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC22 Mar 2023CWJC/1204/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner sought a writ direction to prevent illegal interference with his peaceful possession of land and for police protection under Article 300-A. The court granted liberty to the petitioner to approach the District Magistrate and Superintendent of Police for redressal.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to the petitioner to approach the District Magistrate and Superintendent of Police for redressal within four weeks.

Mithlesh Singh Vs The State of Bihar — Property and Title | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1204 of 2023

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Mithlesh Singh S/o Sri Lakshman Singh R/o Village- Barkagaon Tola Mishrawaliya, P.S.- Bhagwanpur Hat, District- Siwan.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar

¶7

The District Magistrate-cum-Collector, Siwan.

¶8

The Superintendent of Police, Siwan, District- Siwan.

¶9

The Circle Officer, Bhagwanpur Hat (Siwan), District- Siwan.

¶10

The S.H.O. of Bhagwanpur Hat Police Station, District- Siwan.

¶11

... ... Respondent/s

¶12

======================================================

¶13

Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Udit Narayan Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Manish Kumar, GP-4

¶14

======================================================

¶15

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH

¶16

ORAL ORDER

¶17

2 22-03-2023

¶18

The present writ petition has been filed seeking the

¶19

following reliefs:-

¶20

"For direction to the respondents to ensure that there shall be no illegal or unauthorized interference by third persons in peaceful possession of the petitioner on the land obtained as per the Civil Court decree and delivery of possession in Execution Case No. 303 of 1924 arising out of Ejectment Suit no.267 of 1920 and also by dismissal of Title Appeal No.32 of 1936 and decree dated 21.7.1973.

¶21

(b) For direction to the respondents to protect the right to property of the petitioner given under Article 300A of the Constitution of

¶22

Patna High Court CWJC No.1204 of 2023(2) dt.22-03-2023 2/2

¶23

India from illegal and unauthorized intervention by third person in enjoyment of his right to property."

¶24

At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to approach the District Magistrate, Siwan and the Superintendent of Police, Siwan for redressal of his aforesaid grievances.

¶25

Liberty so sought, is granted.

¶26

It is needless to state that in case, appropriate representation is filed within a period of four weeks from today, appropriate steps shall be taken in accordance with law, forthwith.

¶27

The writ petition stands disposed off on the aforesaid

¶28

terms.

¶29

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J)

¶30

kanchan/-

¶31

Mithlesh Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mithlesh Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ram Pravesh Sharma Vs The State of Bihar

Nagendra Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Shivjee Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Anr.

Sonu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Baijnath Chaudhary alias Baijnath Chaudhary Vs The State of Bihar

Ashok Kumar Gupta Vs The State of Bihar