Disposed

Shatrudhan Das v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC17 Mar 2023CWJC/126/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A writ petition seeking quashing of a notice was disposed of. The court granted liberty to the petitioners to challenge a subsequent final order under the Bihar Public Land Encroachment Act, 1956, by filing an appropriate appeal. The petition stands disposed.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to challenge the final order under Section 6(1) of the Act, 1956, by filing an appropriate appeal. Writ petition disposed.

Shatrudhan Das Vs The State of Bihar — Land Acquisition | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.126 of 2023

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Shatrudhan Das S/o Late Vilash Das Resident of Village- Atrar, P.S.- Aurai, Anchal- Aurai, District- Muzaffarpur.

¶4

Sukhchain Das, S/o Late Vilash Das Resident of Village- Atrar, P.S.- Aurai, Anchal- Aurai, District- Muzaffarpur.

¶5

Sumitra Devi @ Sunita Devi, W/o Late Dhyani Das Resident of VillageAtrar, P.S.- Aurai, Anchal- Aurai, District- Muzaffarpur.

¶6

Tapeshwar Das, S/o Late Kusheshwar Das Resident of Village- Atrar, P.S.Aurai, Anchal- Aurai, District- Muzaffarpur.

¶7

... ... Petitioner/s

¶8

Versus

¶9

The State of Bihar through its Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna Old Secretariat, Patna.

¶10

The Secretary, Revenue and Land Reform Department, Bihar, Patna.

¶11

The District Magistrate, Muzaffarpur, District- Muzaffarpur.

¶12

The Sub Divisional Officer (S.D.O.) Muzaffarpur East, DistrictMuzaffarpur.

¶13

The Circle Officer (C.O.) Aurai, Anchal Aurai, District- Muzaffarpur.

¶14

... ... Respondent/s

¶15

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mrs.Nitu Kumari, Advocate Mr. Ratneshwar Prasad, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.Md. Khurshid Alam (AAG-12) Mr. Asif Kalim, AC to AAG-12 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER

¶16

4 17-03-2023 Though the present writ petition was filed for quashing of the notice issued by the Circle Officer, Aurai, District-Muzaffarpur under the provisions of the Bihar Public Land Encroachment Act, 1956, (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act, 1956’), however, a counter affidavit has been filed

¶17

Patna High Court CWJC No.126 of 2023(4) dt.17-03-2023 2/2

¶18

on behalf of the respondent-State wherein it has been stated that the final order under Section 6(1) of the Act, 1956 has been passed on 30.11.2022, hence the learned counsel for the petitioners seeks liberty to challenge the same by filing appropriate appeal.

¶19

Liberty so sought is granted.

¶20

The writ petition stands disposed off.

¶21

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J)

¶22

S.Sb/-

¶23

Shatrudhan Das v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shatrudhan Das v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajkumar Haridwar Gupta @ Raj Kumar Gupta Vs The State of Bihar

Ram Bachan Singh and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Anil Mali and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Urmila Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Kusheshwar Prasad @ Kusheshwar Vs the State of Bihar and Anr.

Awadhesh Rai Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.