This order rejects the petitioners' application for anticipatory bail in a POCSO case alleging attempted rape. The court dismissed the plea due to the offense's gravity and the victim's supported statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C.
The prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners was rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.62710 of 2023
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-210 Year-2023 Thana- SIWAN MUFFASIL District- Siwan
======================================================
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Kumari Anupam For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Md. Fahimuddin ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.62710 of 2023(2) dt.16-10-2023 2/2
the bail petition and submitted that the under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C., the victim girl has supported the prosecution case.
and statement of the victim made under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C., the prayer for anticipatory bail of petitioner is rejected.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)
Shishir/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted in a POCSO case involving attempted rape alleged against the petitioners.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Prince Yadav and others
The State of Bihar
Prabhat Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
