Allowed

Harishankar Sahni v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC16 Oct 2023CR. MISC./61579/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Hon'ble Single Judge allowed bail application of petitioners apprehending arrest in a case involving offences under IPC Sections 341, 323, 307, 354, 379, 504. Granted bail on surrender within six weeks by furnishing bond and sureties.

What did the court decide?

Enlarged on bail in event of their arrest/surrender within six weeks by furnishing bail-bonds of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties of like amount each subject to conditions laid down under Section 438

Harishankar Sahni Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.61579 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-162 Year-2017 Thana- KALYANPUR District- Samastipur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Harishankar Sahni S/O Chalitar Sahni R/O Village- Gumla, P.S.- Kalyanpur, Dist.- Samastipur

¶5

Avinash Sahni S/O Harishankar Sahni R/O Village- Gumla, P.S.- Kalyanpur, Dist.- Samastipur

¶6

... ... Petitioner/s

¶7

Versus

¶8

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Vinay Kumar Mishra For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Akhileshwar Dayal ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶9

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

2 16-10-2023 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶11

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence under Sections 341, 323, 307, 354, 379, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶12

Allegation against these petitioners is that they alongwith other co-accused persons assaulted the informant with l athi, danda , iron rod and bricks and when daughter of the informant came to save her father, she was also assaulted by them. The accused persons also took away mobile phone, gold chain and ear ring from the daughter of informant.

¶13

It is submitted on behalf of petitioners that both parties are agnates and on account of land dispute, the alleged occurrence took place. Injuries are simple in nature. Petitioners have got clean antecedent.

¶14

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.61579 of 2023(2) dt.16-10-2023 2/2

¶15

Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the bail

¶16

petition.

¶17

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances,

¶18

let the above named petitioners, in the event of their arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Samastipur in connection with Kalyanpur P.S. Case No. 162 of 2017, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶19

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)

¶20

anay/-

¶21

U T

Harishankar Sahni v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Harishankar Sahni v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Yadunandan Bhagat Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Haseen Ahmad Vs The State of Bihar

Ramjee Singh, Vs The State of Bihar

Ravi Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Putul Rajak @ Putul Kumar Rajak Vs The State of Bihar

Prince Yadav @ Prince Kumar Vs The State of Bihar