Allowed

Hemlata Kumari v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC3 Jan 2023CR. MISC./57190/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bench allowed anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a criminal case involving offences under sections 467, 468, 471, 420 and 120B IPC, ordering release upon arrest or surrender within six weeks upon furnishing a bail bond.

What did the court decide?

Release of the petitioner on bail in the event of arrest or surrender within six weeks upon furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties.

Hemlata Kumari Vs the State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.57190 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-49 Year-2022 Thana- SARMERA District- Nalanda

¶3

======================================================

¶4

HEMLATA KUMARI D/o Sri Rajkumar Prasad, W/o Sri Dhirendra Resident of Village- Chhoti Pahadi, P.O. Saraiya, P.S.- Sohsarai, District- Nalanda.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Bipin Bihari Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Ajay Mishra ======================================================

¶8

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 03-01-2023

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶12

The petitioner apprehends her arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable u/s 467, 468, 471, 420 and 120B IPC.

¶13

Allegedly the petitioner is said to have got appointment on the post of Panchayat Teacher on the basis of fake certificates.

¶14

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. She has been falsely implicated in this case due to grudge. No such occurrence, in the manner as alleged, has ever taken place. The allegation leveled against the petitioner is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. It is further submitted that the petitioner has already been terminated from the service, which

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57190 of 2022(2) dt.03-01-2023 2/2

¶16

fact is also not denied by learned APP for the State. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

¶17

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, since petitioner has been terminated, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail, in the event of her arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/(Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Sarmera P.S. Case No.49 of 2022, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶18

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J)

¶19

pallavi/-

¶20

U T

Hemlata Kumari v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Hemlata Kumari v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Priya Ranjan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Niranjan Pandit Vs The State of Bihar

Ritu Devi @ Nitu Devi Vs the State of Bihar

Upendra Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Ram Chandra Choudhary @ Ram Chandra Chaudhary Vs The State of Bihar

Chumman Chaudhary @ Chuman Chaudhary Vs the State of Bihar