Allowed

Niranjan Pandit v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC2 Jan 2023CR. MISC./19560/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Patna granted bail to the petitioner apprehending arrest in a complaint case (PS Case No. 15 of 2021) involving multiple offences under IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act, contingent upon the resolution of defects within three weeks.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner enlarged on bail with a bond of Rs. 25,000 and two sureties of like amount if arrested or surrenders within six weeks.

Niranjan Pandit Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19560 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-15 Year-2021 Thana- JEHANABAD COMPLAINT CASE District- Jehanabad

¶3

====================================================== Niranjan Pandit S/O- Ramjee Pandit R/O Village - Dheera Bigha, P.O. - Tehta, P.S. - Makhdumpur, District - Jehanabad.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar

¶7

Sweety Kumari W/o- Niranjan Pandit, D/o - Vinod Pandit R/o Village - Dheera Bigha, P.O. - Tehta, P.S. - Makhdumpur, District - Jehanabad at present R/o Village - Budhanagar Ishlampur Sahar, P.S. - Islampur, District - Nalanda.

¶8

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

======================================================

¶10

Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Mungeshwar Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sunil Prasad Ms. Veena Kumari Jaiswal

¶11

======================================================

¶12

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER

¶13

5 02-01-2023 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to

¶15

remove the defects, if any, within three weeks.

¶16

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 323, 341, 379, 498A, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4 of the D.P. Act.

¶17

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the issued between the parties has been resolved in terms of one time settlement. This fact has not been disputed by the learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2.

¶18

Considering the facts and circumstances of the

¶19

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19560 of 2022(5) dt.02-01-2023 2/2

¶20

case, let the above named petitioner in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Complaint Case No. 15 of 2021, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶21

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J)

¶22

devendra/-

¶23

U T

Niranjan Pandit v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Niranjan Pandit v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ujjwal Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Banti Tiwari @ Rajanish Tiwary Vs The State of Bihar

Dharmendra Choudhary Vs The State of Bihar

Priya Ranjan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Ritu Devi @ Nitu Devi Vs the State of Bihar

Sachin Kumar Gupta Vs The State of Bihar