Allowed

Vinay Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC11 Jul 2023CR. MISC./4676/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court granted bail to the petitioner, who was charged with stealing 33 KV electric wires. The court有条件地 released him, directing him to pay Rs. 1,00,000/- to the electricity company as a condition for bail.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail by furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties, contingent upon the petitioner paying Rs. 1,00,000/- to the Electricity Department.

Vinay Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Contract and Commercial Disputes | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4676 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-332 Year-2022 Thana- PIPRA District- East Champaran

¶3

====================================================== Vinay Kumar S/O Rampravesh Mahato R/V- Mathia, Bariarpur, P.S.Piprakothi, District- East Champaran At Motihari

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar

¶7

North Bihar Power Distribution Co. Ltd. Through Junior Engineer Electricity Branch Chakia, East Champaran At Motihari

¶8

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Shashank Shekhar For the NBPDCL : Mr. Lokesh Kumar Singh For the State : Mr.Arun Kumar ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER

¶11

3 11-07-2023 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶12

The petitioner is languishing in custody in a

¶13

case registered for the offences punishable under

¶14

Sections 379, 411 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶15

The prosecution case as per F.I.R is that the

¶16

Electrical Engineer, Electricity Branch, Chakia received

¶17

an information that some unknown persons are cutting 33 KV wire. On getting such information, he reached at the place where, on enquiry, the villagers told that due

¶18

to hulla, though the accused fled away but a pick-up van

¶19

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4676 of 2023(3) dt.11-07-2023 2/4

¶20

and the driver namely Vinay Kumar were apprehended by the villagers which were later on handed over to the

¶21

police. Some cutting wire from electric pole were recovered from the vehicle in question. The Electricity Department calculated the loss to the tune of Rs. 3,09,776/-.

¶22

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner has no concern either with the alleged pick-up van or the stolen wire. It is the case of the prosecution that petitioner was apprehended by local villagers, but the seizure list has not been attested by any independent witness, nor it has been attested by any person concerned with the electricity department which is contrary to the mandatory provisions of Section 100 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The petitioner is languishing in custody since 17.11.2022. A statement has been made in para 3 of the petition that petitioner has no criminal

¶23

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4676 of 2023(3) dt.11-07-2023 3/4

¶24

antecedent.

¶25

In contra, learned counsel appearing on behalf

¶26

of the North Bihar Power Distribution Company Limited and learned A.P.P appearing on behalf of the State have vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submitted that petitioner was apprehended from the spot and from the vehicle which was being driven by him, stolen wires were recovered. The Electricity Department has also suffered a loss of Rs. 3,09,776/-.

¶27

The petitioner, in the alternative, is ready to pay Rs. 1,00,000/-(One Lac) to the Electricity Department, subject to the final outcome of the case.

¶28

The petitioner is directed to pay Rs. 1,00,000/(One Lac) to the Electrical Executive Engineer, North Bihar Power Distribution Company Limited, Chakia Division, East Champaran, Motihari.

¶29

Considering the facts aforesaid and the period under custody, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-

¶30

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4676 of 2023(3) dt.11-07-2023 4/4

¶31

(Ten Thousands) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, East Champaran at Motihari in connection with Pipra P.S. Case No. 332 of 2022.

¶32

The bail bonds of the petitioner will be accepted

¶33

by the learned Court below on showing receipt of Rs. 1,00,000/-(One Lac) to be paid in favour of Electrical Executive Engineer, North Bihar Power Distribution Company Limited, Chakia Division, East Champaran, Motihari.

¶34

The aforesaid payment will be subject to the final outcome of the case.

¶35

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J)

¶36

Shageer/-

¶37

U T

Vinay Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vinay Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Guddu Yadav @ Pitamber Yadav Vs the State of Bihar

Srikant Yadav @ Srikant Kumar @ Mukha Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Soljar @ Soljar Vs The State of Bihar

Sudarshan @ Sudarsan Ram @ Sudarsan @ Sudrashan Kahar Vs The State of Bihar

Anjum @ Anjum Adil @ Anjum Adhil Vs The State of Bihar

Prashant Yadav @ Prashant Kumar Vs The State of Bihar