Allowed

Prashant Yadav @ Prashant Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC11 Jul 2023CR. MISC./12897/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Patna granted regular bail to the petitioner in a case involving Section 120(B) and 414 IPC and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act concerning liquor recovery. The petitioner sought bail after 12 days in remand custody.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner enlarged on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount.

Prashant Yadav @ Prashant Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Narcotics (NDPS) | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12897 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-188 Year-2021 Thana- SAHEBPUR KAMAL DistrictBegusarai

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Prashant Yadav @ Prashant Kumar S/O Viveka Yadav @ Viveka Kumar Resident of village- Raghunathpur, P.S.- Sahebpur Kamal, DistrictBeguasarai.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Pankaj Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Khurshid Anwar ======================================================

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER

¶10

3 11-07-2023

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State .

¶12

The petitioner has filed the instant application for grant of regular bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 120(B), 414 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

¶13

The prosecution case relates to recovery of total 331.64 liter illicit liquor from different places.

¶14

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in the present case. The petitioner was not apprehended on the spot. His name has been transpired in this case only on the basis of confessional statement of apprehended accused persons. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession or

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12897 of 2023(3) dt.11-07-2023 2/2

¶16

from the house of the petitioner. It is also submitted that petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 12.10.2022.

¶17

Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for Bail.

¶18

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case as well as period of custody, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail in connection with Sahebpur Kamal P.S. Case No.188 of 2021 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional District & Sessions Judge2nd-cum-Exclusive Special Judge (Excise), Begusarai.

¶19

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J)

¶20

lata/-

¶21

U T

Prashant Yadav @ Prashant Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Prashant Yadav @ Prashant Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Guddu Yadav @ Pitamber Yadav Vs the State of Bihar

Srikant Yadav @ Srikant Kumar @ Mukha Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Soljar @ Soljar Vs The State of Bihar

Vinay Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Sudarshan @ Sudarsan Ram @ Sudarsan @ Sudrashan Kahar Vs The State of Bihar

Anjum @ Anjum Adil @ Anjum Adhil Vs The State of Bihar