Allowed

Srikant Yadav @ Srikant Kumar @ Mukha v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC10 Jul 2023CR. MISC./14184/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted bail to the petitioner in a robbery case under Section 392 IPC, noting he had been in custody since July 18, 2022, was not named initially in the FIR, and no evidence was recovered from him.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail on furnishing bonds of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Buxar.

Srikant Yadav @ Srikant Kumar @ Mukha Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14184 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-122 Year-2022 Thana- NAWANAGAR District- Buxar

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Srikant Yadav @ Srikant Kumar @ Mukha Son Of Ramdular Singh R/VBhundadih, P.S.- Dawath, District- Rohtas

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Arun Kumar Gupta For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Ram Bilash Roy Raman ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER

¶10

3 10-07-2023

¶11

The defect as pointed out by the office is

¶12

ignored.

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

¶14

learned APP for the State.

¶15

The petitioner is languishing in custody in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶16

It is a case of commission of robbery in the

¶17

bank.

¶18

It is submitted by learned counsel for the

¶19

petitioner that petitioner is innocent and he has falsely

¶20

been implicated in this case. The petitioner is not named

¶21

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14184 of 2023(3) dt.10-07-2023 2/2

¶22

in the F.I.R and his name subsequently sprang up on the confessional statement of co-accused person. The petitioner was not apprehended from the spot. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has still not been put on T.I.P.

¶23

The petitioner is languishing in custody since 18.07.2022.

¶24

Considering the fact aforesaid and the period under custody, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/(Ten Thousands) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Buxar in connection with Nawanagar P.S. Case No. 122 of 2022.

¶25

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J)

¶26

Shageer/-

Srikant Yadav @ Srikant Kumar @ Mukha v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Srikant Yadav @ Srikant Kumar @ Mukha v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Niyamul Vs The State of Bihar

Faisal Imam Vs the State of Bihar

Lekhama Ram @ Likhama Ram Vs The State of Bihar

Guddu Yadav @ Pitamber Yadav Vs the State of Bihar

Md. Soljar @ Soljar Vs The State of Bihar

Khusbun Khatoon Vs The State of Bihar