Allowed

Sachin Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC6 Jul 2023CR. MISC./4435/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge order enlarging the petitioner on anticipatory bail for offences under S. 498A IPC and S. 4 Dowry Prohibition Act on undertaking to pay monthly maintenance of Rs. 3500/- subject to specific conditions including bank deposit and savings submission.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner enlarged on bail on bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of Rs. 10,000 each, undertaking to pay Rs. 3500/- monthly maintenance.

Sachin Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Dowry and Cruelty | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4435 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-212 Year-2022 Thana- ROHTAS COMPLAINT CASE DistrictRohtas

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Sachin Kumar S/O Madhusudan Gupta Resident of village- Balia, Jeera Basti, P.S.- Balia, District- Balia (U.P.)

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar

¶8

Rekha Kumari D/O Anjani Kumar Gupta Resident of village- Dinara, P.S.Dinara, District- Rohtas, at present Takiya, P.S.- Sasaram Model, DistrictRohtas.

¶9

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

======================================================

¶11

Appearance :

¶12

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shankar Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Narendra Kumar Singh, A.P.P.

¶13

======================================================

¶14

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶15

3 06-07-2023 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner, the State and opposite party No.2.

¶16

The petitioner who is husband of opposite party No. 2 apprehends arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 498A of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

¶17

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner offers and undertakes that he is ready to give maintenance amount of Rs. 3500/- per month, starting from this month, to opposite party No. 2.

¶18

In view of the undertaking of learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is ready to give maintenance amount of Rs. 3500/- per month, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, above-named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten

¶19

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4435 of 2023(3) dt.06-07-2023 2/2

¶20

thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sasaram (Rohtas) in connection with Complaint Case No. 212 of 2022, subject to the conditions laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure as well as on the following conditions:-

¶21

(1) Opposite party No. 2 would file an affidavit before the court below and bring on record her savings bank account number for its communication to the petitioner.

¶22

(2) Petitioner would deposit the aforesaid maintenance amount per month in the savings bank account of the opposite party No. 2.

¶23

(3) In case, the petitioner fails to deposit the maintenance amount for two consecutive months, the court below would be at liberty to cancel the bail-bond.

¶24

(4) The aforementioned payment will be subject to any order passed in matrimonial, maintenance or connected proceedings. The present order, in no way, will preclude the parties to resolve the issue otherwise.

¶25

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)

¶26

Navya/-

¶27

U T

Sachin Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sachin Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Anil Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Nanipat Sah Vs The State of Bihar

Sambhu Sah Vs The State of Bihar

Sanesh Ram Vs the State of Bihar

Md. Afreidi Vs The State of Bihar

Rakesh Yadav @ Arvind Kumar Vs The State of Bihar