Dismissed

Rakesh Yadav @ Arvind Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC6 Jul 2023CR. MISC./15220/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this Criminal Miscellaneous petition, the High Court addressed a bail application in a case involving IPC sections 307/504/506. The Court hearing the oral arguments observed allegations of assault with an iron rod, noting the gravity of the injury despite the petitioner's claim of a free fight, and ultimately dismissed the prayer for bail.

What did the court decide?

Prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected.

Rakesh Yadav @ Arvind Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15220 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-115 Year-2022 Thana- AKHODHIGOLA District- Rohtas

¶3

======================================================

¶4

RAKESH YADAV @ ARVIND KUMAR S/o Late Sipahi Yadav R/o VillageAnkorhi, P.S.- Ankorhigola, Distt- Rohtas.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Ms/Mrs. Usha Rai, Advocate Mr Ashok Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Pramod Kumar Pandey, Addl Public Prosecutor Mr. S.Pd.Singh, Senior Advocate \ Kr.Sameer, & R.Paswan, Advocate ======================================================

¶8

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶10

3 06-07-2023

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, the

¶12

informant and the State.

¶13

Petitioner apprehends arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 307/504/506 and other ancillary sections of the Indian Penal Code.

¶14

As per the prosecution case, on the alleged date and time of the occurrence, accused persons including the petitioner assaulted with iron rod as a result of which three persons sustained multiple grievous injuries.

¶15

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that allegation of assault is general and omnibus against the petitioner and no specific overt act has been alleged against him.

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15220 of 2023(3) dt.06-07-2023 2/2

¶17

Free fight took place between the parties in which both sides sustained injuries. Case and counter case.

¶18

Learned counsel for the State and informant oppose the prayer for bail. They submit that the petitioner is named in the FIR with specific and direct allegation that he and other accused persons assaulted the informant side, causing grievous injuries to three persons.

¶19

Considering the nature and gravity of allegation, prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected.

¶20

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)

¶21

shashi/-

¶22

U T

Rakesh Yadav @ Arvind Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rakesh Yadav @ Arvind Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Anil Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Nanipat Sah Vs The State of Bihar

Sambhu Sah Vs The State of Bihar

Sanesh Ram Vs the State of Bihar

Sachin Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Afreidi Vs The State of Bihar