Allowed

Ajit Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC14 Jul 2023CR. MISC./41897/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Regular bail application under Sections 341, 323, 307 and 504 IPC read with Section 34 IPC and Sections 26, 27 and 35 of the Arms Act arising from an assault. Considering the allegations and period of custody, the court allowed bail on a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two like sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the CJM, Darbhanga.

Ajit Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.41897 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-612 Year-2022 Thana- DARBHANGA SADAR District-

¶3

Darbhanga

¶4

======================================================

¶5

AJIT KUMAR son of Hira Lal Mahto Resident of Village- Gehumi Shivdhara, PS. Sadar, (Mabbi O.P.), District- Darbhanga

¶6

... ... Petitioner/s

¶7

Versus

¶8

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Brij Nandad Prasad For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh ======================================================

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 14-07-2023

¶11

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and

¶12

learned APP for the State.

¶13

2. Let the defect(s), if any, be removed within a period of four weeks from today.

¶14

3. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Sadar P.S. (Mabi O.P.) Case No. 612 of 2022 registered for the offence under Sections 341, 323, 307 and 504 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 26, 27 and 35 of the Arms Act.

¶15

4. The allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner along with one Gyanendra Kumar @ Gyani has assaulted the victim.

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41897 of 2023(2) dt.14-07-2023 2/2

¶17

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has not committed any crime and he was just standing at the place of occurrence and it is Gyanendra Kumar @ Gyani who had fired at the victim.

¶18

6. Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that the petitioner is in custody since 27.09.2022.

¶19

7. Learned A.P.P. has vehemently opposed the prayer

¶20

for bail.

¶21

8. Considering the aforesaid facts and the period of custody, this application for regular bail is allowed.

¶22

9. Let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Darbhanga in connection with Sadar P.S. (Mabi O.P.) Case No. 612 of 2022.

¶23

(Sandeep Kumar, J)

¶24

Vikas/-

¶25

U T

Ajit Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ajit Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vinod Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar Through Director General Of Police, Cabinet Vigilance Department. Govt. Of Bihar

Saurav Anurag Vs The State of Bihar

Sudhir Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar Through D. G. P. Bihar, Patna and Ors.

Rajeev Kumar Sharma Vs The State of Bihar

Dinesh Kaura Vs The State of Bihar

MD Jaharuddin Vs The State of Bihar