Allowed

Kanahiya Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC2 May 2023CR. MISC./3776/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought regular bail for alleged teasing of a minor girl under IPC 354(B) and POCSO sections 12/8. Considering his clean antecedents and custody since October 2022, the court granted bail on furnishing bail bonds with two sureties, subject to cooperation in trial.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted: Rs.10,000 bond with two sureties, subject to conditions of trial cooperation.

Kanahiya Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Child Sexual Offences (POCSO) | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3776 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-598 Year-2022 Thana- KAUWAKOL District- Nawada

¶3

======================================================

¶4

KANAHIYA KUMAR S/O SADANANDAN YADAV R/V- KOLHUAR, P.S.- KAWAKOLE, DISTRICT- NAWADA

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar

¶8

MUNNI KUMARI D/O SHIVDANI THAKUR R/V- RAMPUR BALUA, P.S.- KAWAKOLE, DISTRICT- NAWADA

¶9

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sheo Kumar Prasad For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Md. Aslam Ansari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY

¶11

ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 02-05-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned APP for the State.

¶13

In this case, the petitioner is seeking regular bail in connection with Kawakole P.S. Case No. 598 of 2022, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 354(B) of the IPC and section 12/8 of the POCSO Act.

¶14

The allegation against the petitioner is that he teased the informant, who is a minor girl and the petitioner was apprehended by the villagers.

¶15

The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that he is a person of clean antecedent and under custody since 23.10.2022.

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3776 of 2023(2) dt.02-05-2023 2/2

¶17

Considering the above-mentioned facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above-named be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.D.J. Vith-cum-Special Judge, POCSO Act, Nawada in connection with Kawakole P.S. Case No. 598 of 2022, subject to the following conditions:-

¶18

(i) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court.

¶19

(ii) If the petitioner is found involved in future in the similar type of offence, the prosecution will have liberty to file an application before the court below for cancellation of the bail of the petitioner and the learned court below will take decision in accordance with law.

¶20

(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J)

¶21

Kundan/Nirmal

¶22

U T

Kanahiya Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kanahiya Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kumar Sanu Sinha Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Nasim @ Nasim Vs The State of Bihar

Abhishek Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Amit Kumar Choudhary Vs The State of Bihar

Khesari Yadav @ Sanjay Singh @ Sanjay Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Kailu Rana Vs the State of Bihar