Anticipatory bail application dismissed for non-prosecution as no one appeared for the petitioner when the matter was called; the application had earlier been dismissed for non-prosecution and restored.
none granted; application dismissed for default
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.34021 of 2021
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-66 Year-2021 Thana- JAKKANPUR District- Patna
======================================================
Snehil Kumar Gupta @ Snehil Raj Gupta S/O Sunil Kumar Gupta R/O Purandarpur, Near Brahmdeo Bhawan, Ward No. 19, P.S-Jakkanpur, DistrictPatna
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The state of bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : None For the Opposite Party/s : Mrs. Meena Singh, APP ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER
matter is called.
State is present.
anticipatory bail application was dismissed for non-prosecution vide order dated 23.11.2022 and after restoration of the same the matter again has been taken up today also but no one appears on behalf of the petitioner when the matter is called.
Ibrar//- U T
(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
Snehil Kumar Gupta @ Snehil Raj Gupta
The State of Bihar
Rajesh Kumar Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
