The High Court of Patna dismissed the application for non-compliance with a dated order allowing time to remove defects, noting no steps were taken by the petitioner's counsel.
Application dismissed due to non-compliance of the previous order dated 17.08.2023 regarding removal of defects.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 30339 of 2023
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-169 Year-2016 Thana- AGAMKUAN District- Patna
======================================================
Lal Bahadur Prasad Son Of Late Jagan Prasad R/O Tej Narayan Complex, Flat No. 5/E, Sector-8, Bahadurpur Housing Colony, P.S.- Agamkuan, Distt.Patna Permanent Add.- Vill. And Post- Bindawan, P.S.- Ucchaka, Distt.Gopalganj And Also Proprietor M/S Purnima Cold Storage, Yogipur, P.S.Patrakar Nagar, Distt.- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
======================================================
Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Digamber Kr. Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Dr. Ajeet Kumar, APP ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER
6 16-10-2023 Heard Mr.Digamber Kr. Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.Dr. Ajeet Kumar, learned APP for the State.
Vide order dated 17.08.2023, two weeks time was allowed to the petitioner to remove the defects but the office report suggests that no steps have been taken by the learned counsel for the petitioner regarding removal of the defects.
In view of the aforesaid, this application is dismissed for non-compliance of order of this Court.
(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
Nitesh/- U T
Lal Bahadur Prasad
The State of Bihar
Madan Prasad Gupta
Rajesh Kumar Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
