Anticipatory bail application in a Patna case; petitioner withdrew it, stating no present apprehension of arrest and liberty to approach the appropriate forum later. The court permitted withdrawal and dismissed the application as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22956 of 2023
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-495 Year-2018 Thana- DANAPUR District- Patna
======================================================
SUJEET KUMAR S/o- KEDAR SINGH @ KEDAR RAY Village- Nayatola Ps- Danapur Dist- Patna
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shankar Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER
4 17-10-2023 Heard Mr. Shankar Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh, learned APP for the State.
petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the application for the present inasmuch as presently is no apprehension of arrest and whenever the apprehension of arrest will arise, he shall approach the appropriate forum.
Ibrar//-
(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
U T
Sujeet Kumar
The State of Bihar
Rajesh Kumar Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
