In a criminal miscellaneous application, the court dismissed the petitioner's constitution for failure to file a supplementary affidavit despite repeated adjournments.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32567 of 2023
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1462 Year-2022 Thana- NAWADA District- Nawada
======================================================
GEETA DEVI W/O RAM NARESH SHARMA Resident of village- Pariya, Bhola Nagar, Post- Marui, Nawada, P.S.- Kadirganj, (O.P.), District- Nawada.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : None For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anil Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER
No one appears on behalf of the petitioner, however
learned APP for the State is present.
counsel for the petitioner vide order dated 07.08.2023, 19.08.2023 and 04.10.2023, no supplementary affidavit has been filed as yet.
3. Dismissed.
(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
Prakash Narayan U T
GEETA DEVI W/O RAM NARESH SHARMA
THE STATE OF BIHAR
RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
