Appellant against bail rejection challenging low injury severity and false implication in firing case; court allowed appeal and granted bail on Rs.10,000 bond.
Appellant enlarged on bail on bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.2932 of 2023
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-16 Year-2023 Thana- SAKATPUR District- Darbhanga
======================================================
Raju Chaudhary Son Of Late Kamlesh Chaudhary Resident Of Village Nadiyami Surtihari Tola, Ps- Sakatpur, District- Darbhanga
... ... Appellant/s
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr.Amarendra Narayan For the Respondent/s : Mr.Usha Kumari 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.2932 of 2023(4) dt.02-11-2023 2/3
injury.
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.2932 of 2023(4) dt.02-11-2023 3/3
(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J)
Arish/-
U T
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the appellant's bail application deserves to be accepted given allegations of false implication and lack of specific overt act?
Whether the gravity of injuries and nature of the case justify granting bail?
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Raju Chaudhary
State of Bihar
Lalchand Chaupal
Sunil Kumar Panwar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
