The High Court of Patna granted regular bail to the petitioner falsely alleged in a kidnapping case under IPC Sections 363, 366(A), and 34. Bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties was ordered.
Bail granted on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount each.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2890 of 2023
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-28 Year-2019 Thana- BHEJA District- Madhubani
======================================================
SONU SINGH S/o Ranjan Singh R/o Village-Bhawanipur, P.S.- Bheja, DisttMadhubani.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Jitendra Kumar Bharti For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Pushpa Sinha.1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER
3 04-05-2023
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 363, 366(A) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
The allegation against the petitioner along with others is of kidnapping the daughter of the informant, when she went outside to attend nature call.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He has committed no offence. He submitted that the victim girl has
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2890 of 2023(3) dt.04-05-2023 2/3
recovered and her statement has recorded u/s 164 of the Cr.P.C., in which she stated that petitioner and others co-accused had kidnapped and made her unconscious. When she regain conscious, she found herself at Delhi, from there Birendra Singh brought to Darbhanga, she was confined for 4 days and also assaulted by them. The victim girl does not whispered about the commission of physical abuse/misbehave with her. Moreover, petitioner has got no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 the bail petition. He is languishing in judicial custody since 30.08.2022.
The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State and submitted that petitioner along with others coaccused taken her to Delhi after getting her unconscious, thereafter brought her to Darbhanga and the accused persons left her at the house of Mukhiya Ji of the village.
Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2890 of 2023(3) dt.04-05-2023 3/3
Judicial Magistrate-II, Jhanjharpur, Madhubani in connection with Bheja P.S. Case No. 28 of 2019.
(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J)
arish/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner should be granted regular bail in a kidnapping case involving Sections 363, 366(A), and 34 of the IPC.
Sonu Singh
The State of Bihar
Sunil Kumar Panwar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
