Disposed

Sant Lal Singh v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC8 Aug 2023CR. MISC./25681/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Anticipatory bail application in a cheating and criminal breach of trust case arising from a business transaction dispute over Rs.13,39,779. The court held the dispute was purely civil in nature and released the petitioner on bail on specified terms upon arrest or surrender.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000 with two sureties of like amount each, subject to Section 438(2) Cr.P.C., within six weeks.

Sant Lal Singh Vs the State of Bihar — Cheating and Forgery | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25681 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-218 Year-2021 Thana- TILAUTHU District- Rohtas

¶3

====================================================== Sant Lal Singh Son of Sri Shyam Narayan Singh R/O Village- Mohanpur, P.S.- Kudra, Didstrict- Kaimur (Bhabhua). ... ... Petitioner.

¶4

Versus

¶5

The State of Bihar.

¶6

Binod Prasad Gupta, Branch Manager, Utara Foods and Feeds Private Limited, resident of village & P.O. Pachaua, P.S. Hariharganj, District Palamu (Jharkhand). ... ... Opposite Parties. ====================================================== Appearance :

¶7

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dheeraj Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anuj Kumar Shrivastava

¶8

======================================================

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER

¶10

4 08-08-2023 Perused the office notes.

¶11

By order dated 01.09.2022, notice was issued to

¶12

opposite party no.2, which was received by his son.

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a

¶14

jointness petition stating that opposite party no.2 is living with his son in mess and business jointly. Hence, the notice issued to opposite party no.2 may be deemed to be validly served. Learned counsel for the petitioner has also filed two copies of the bail application and the same is kept on record.

¶15

In view of the aforesaid, the service of notice upon opposite party no.2 is deemed to be validly served.

¶16

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State but in spite of valid service of notice none is present on behalf of opposite party no.2.

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25681 of 2022(4) dt.08-08-2023 2/3

¶18

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 406/420 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶19

The allegation against the petitioner is that he has dishonestly misappropriated Rs.13,39,779/- of the informant’s company/opposite party no.2.

¶20

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that no such occurrence as alleged ever took place. He has been falsely implicated in this case due to personal grudge and ulterior motive at the instance of his enemies. The allegation levelled against the petitioner is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. There is inordinate and abnormal delay of about more than one month without assigning any plausible and convincing reason for the said delay, which creates serious doubt about the prosecution case. It is further submitted that the petitioner has filed an informatory petition on 30.11.2021 before the C.J.M., Bhabua stating therein that Company and its Branch Manager committed cheating and misused papers of the petitioner. Petitioner has one criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of this application.

¶21

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail.

¶22

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25681 of 2022(4) dt.08-08-2023 3/3

¶23

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case as the dispute between the parties is of business transaction and purely civil in nature, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/(Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Tilauthu P.S. Case No. 218 of 2021, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶24

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J)

¶25

Trivedi/-

¶26

U T

Sant Lal Singh v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sant Lal Singh v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ripu Daman Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Sahin Suraiya @ Suraiya Khatoon @ Suraiya Batlon Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Ahsan Vs The State of Bihar

Mahesh Yadav @ Maho Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Naveen Rai @ Naveen Kumar @ Navin Ray Vs the State of Bihar

Sonu Rawat @ Sanjiv Kumar Vs The State of Bihar