Mahesh Yadav @ Maho Yadav v. The State of Bihar
Case brief
What is this about?
In a criminal miscellaneous matter, a single judge rejected the petitioner's prayer for anticipatory bail sought in connection with an FIR alleging cheating and criminal breach of trust regarding a land sale agreement where the sale deed was allegedly not executed after receiving payment.
What did the court decide?
Prayer for anticipatory bail rejected in connection with Warisaliganj P.S. Case No. 314 of 2020.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13247 of 2023
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-314 Year-2020 Thana- WARISLIGANJ District- Nawada
======================================================
Mahesh Yadav @ Maho Yadav Son Of Kashi Gop Resident Of Ward No.-19, Balawapar, Warisaliganj, P.S.- Warisaliganj, District- Nawada
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Suryakant Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Sunil Kumar Pandey For the Informant Mr. Durgesh Nandan ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN
ORAL ORDER
- 5 08-08-2023
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, informant
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether an FIR for cheating based on an alleged civil dispute regarding land sale warrants grant of anticipatory bail.
Whether the subject matter of the dispute is purely civil in nature and criminal proceedings are maintainable.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Mahesh Yadav @ Maho Yadav
- respondent
The State of Bihar
Coram
Anjani Kumar Sharan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court