Allowed

Ajay Mahto @ Ajabiya Mahto v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC15 May 2023CR. MISC./2110/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge empowered bail application filed by petitioner accused of murder under Sections 302 and 34 IPC alleging false implication and lack of evidence. Court allowed bail on furnishing of bond and sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of like amount to the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Munger.

Ajay Mahto @ Ajabiya Mahto Vs The State of Bihar — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2110 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-278 Year-2021 Thana- MUNGER MUFFASIL District- Munger

¶3

======================================================

¶4

AJAY MAHTO @ AJABIYA MAHTO Son of Darshan Mahto Resident of Village- Banshipur Basgadha, Medani Chauki, P.S.- Medani Chauki, DistrictLakhisarai

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Raj Kishor Prasad For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Uday Pratap Singh ======================================================

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER

¶10

3 15-05-2023

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶12

The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶13

The allegation against the petitioner along with others is of killing the husband of the informant.

¶14

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case due to dirty village politics. He has committed no offence. There is no specific overt act against the petitioner. On the basis of suspicion, the name of the petitioner has come into light. There is no consistent evidence and no eye-witness of the alleged

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2110 of 2023(3) dt.15-05-2023 2/2

¶16

occurrence. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of the bail petition. He is languishing in judicial custody since 08.08.2022.

¶17

The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for

¶18

the State.

¶19

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Munger in connection with Munger Muffasil P.S. Case No. 278 of 2021.

¶20

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J)

¶21

arish/-

¶22

U T

Ajay Mahto @ Ajabiya Mahto v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ajay Mahto @ Ajabiya Mahto v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Raj Kumari Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Abhishek Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Kaushal Kumar @ Kaushal Kumar Shyam @ Kaushal @ Kumar Kaushal Kumar Shyam Vs The State of Bihar

Ranjan Mandal Vs The State of Bihar

Imamul Alam @ Izmamul Alam Vs The State of Bihar

Sunil Thakur @ Sunil Kumar Thakur Vs The State of Bihar