High Court bail petition. Petitioners sought regular bail in a snatching case under IPC 456 and 379. They argued false implication and lack of FIR names. Court inclined to grant bail on security with sureties to Judicial Magistrate.
Enlargement of petitioners on bail by furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties to the learned CJM, Hajipur.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17424 of 2023
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-284 Year-2022 Thana- BIDUPUR District- Vaishali
======================================================
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ashok Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Chandra Sen Prasad Singh ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER
2 12-05-2023
learned APP for the State.
The petitioners have prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 456 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code.
As per allegation in the FIR, three miscreants came on a motorcycle bearing registration no. BR31A-7804 and snatched the bag of the informant containing 16 parcels worth Rs. 21515.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. Neither the petitioners are named in the FIR not put on TIP. There is no eye witness of the alleged occurrence. Nothing has
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17424 of 2023(2) dt.12-05-2023 2/2
been recovered from their conscious possession. This case is triable by learned judicial magistrate. Petitioners are languishing in judicial custody since24.8.2022.
The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.
Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned CJM, Hajipur, Vaishali in connection with Bidupur P.S. Case No. 284 of 2022.
(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J)
sushma2203/-
U
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioners, implicated in a snatching case but not named in the FIR, are entitled to regular bail.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Abhishek Kumar
Sunny Kumar
State of Bihar
Sunil Kumar Panwar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
