Allowed

Kaushal Kumar @ Kaushal Kumar Shyam @ Kaushal @ Kumar Kaushal Kumar Shyam v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC12 May 2023CR. MISC./18261/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single-judge oral order allowing bail to petitioner accused of theft and mischief under IPC. Court released petitioner on bond with two sureties, citing lack of evidence named in FIR and non-incriminating articles recovered.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to be enlarged on bail by furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount each.

Kaushal Kumar @ Kaushal Kumar Shyam @ Kaushal @ Kumar Kaushal… — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.18261 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-401 Year-2019 Thana- BIDUPUR District- Vaishali

¶3

======================================================

¶4

KAUSHAL KUMAR @ KAUSHAL KUMAR SHYAM @ KAUSHAL @ KUMAR KAUSHAL KUMAR SHYAM Son of Rajushyam @ Rajukumar Resident of village - Rahimapur, P.S.- Biddupur, District - Vaishali

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Kanchan Kumari For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Khurshid Anwar ======================================================

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 12-05-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶11

The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 379 and 356 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶12

As per prosecution case, when the informant was returning from outside, some unknown persons were riding on a bike stopped the informant and thrashed him. Thereafter, they took away his pulsar bike as well as his mobile.

¶13

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case due to dirty village politics. He has committed no offence. Petitioner is not named in the FIR, the same has been lodged against

¶14

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18261 of 2023(2) dt.12-05-2023 2/2

¶15

unknown persons. The name of the petitioner has come into light, on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused Aman Kumar, which has got no evidentiary value in the eyes of law. No incriminating article has recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. He is languishing in judicial custody since 12.10.2022.

¶16

The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for

¶17

the State.

¶18

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate- 1^st Class, Hajipur Vaishali in connection with Bidupur P.S. Case No. 401 of 2019.

¶19

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J)

¶20

arish/-

¶21

U T

Kaushal Kumar @ Kaushal Kumar Shyam @ Kaushal @ Kumar Kaushal Kumar Shyam v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kaushal Kumar @ Kaushal Kumar Shyam @ Kaushal @ Kumar Kaushal Kumar Shyam v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jhunna Mishra Vs the State of Bihar

Md. Khurshid Alam @ Md. Khurshid @ Khurshid Alam Vs The State of Bihar

Vishwajeet Saha @ Bishwajeet Saha Vs The State of Bihar

Surendra Choudhary Vs The State of Bihar

Upendra Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Ranjeet Kumar @ Ranjeet Kumar Yadav Vs The State of Bihar