Allowed

Santosh Kumar Mishra @ Santosh Mishra v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC24 Jun 2023CR. MISC./20462/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

, This court, on 24-06-2023, allowed the petitioners' application for anticipatory bail. The petitioners were apprehending arrest in a case involving offences under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 384, 379, 504, and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. They claimed to be persons with clean antecedents and that the allegations were false. The judges held that, considering the submissions made, the petitione

What did the court decide?

released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court within six weeks.

Santosh Kumar Mishra @ Santosh Mishra Vs The State of Bihar — Cheque Dishonour | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20462 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-839 Year-2022 Thana- MADHEPURA District- Madhepura

¶3

======================================================

¶4

SANTOSH KUMAR MISHRA @ SANTOSH MISHRA S/O LATE RADHAKANT MISHRA R/v- Machhbakhra, Ward No. 09, P.S.Madhepura (Bharrahi O.P.), District- Madhepura

¶5

JAWAHAR KUMAR MISHRA @ JAWAHAR MISHRA S/O LATE RADHAKANT MISHRA R/v- Machhbakhra, Ward No. 09, P.S.Madhepura (Bharrahi O.P.), District- Madhepura

¶6

JAIPRAKASH MISHRA S/O LATE RADHAKANT MISHRA R/vMachhbakhra, Ward No. 09, P.S.- Madhepura (Bharrahi O.P.), DistrictMadhepura

¶7

ANTOSH MISHRA @ ANTOSH KUMAR @ PAPPU KUMAR MISHRA S/O LATE RADHAKANT MISHRA R/v- Machhbakhra, Ward No. 09, P.S.Madhepura (Bharrahi O.P.), District- Madhepura

¶8

AMIT KUMAR MISHRA @ AMIT JHA S/O LATE VIJAY JHA @ VIJAY KUMAR MISHRA Resident of Village- Padariya, P.S.- Madhepura (Bharrahi O.P.), District- Madhepura.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shail Kumari, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dinesh Singh, APP ======================================================

¶13

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER

¶14

3 24-06-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶15

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 384, 379, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and the informant

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20462 of 2023(3) dt.24-06-2023 2/3

¶18

alleges that on account of not paying the extortion amount of Rs. 5,00,000/- six named accused persons including the petitioner alongwith four unknown came and hurled abuses upon the informant, it is next alleged that petitioner No. 5 opened fire upon the informant but missed and thereafter petitioner No. 3 assaulted the informant with butt of pistol and blood started oozing from his head and thereafter the accused persons looted gold ring alongwith Rs. 50,000.

¶19

The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the anticipatory bail application of petitioner No. 2 and 5 has already been withdrawn earlier, it is next submitted that from bare perusal of the allegation as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that the petitioners have been falsely been implicated when admittedly petitioners are person with clean antecedent and even the injuries suffered is simple in nature.

¶20

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

¶21

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-

¶22

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20462 of 2023(3) dt.24-06-2023 3/3

¶23

(Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Madhepura (Bharrahi O.P.) P.S. Case No. 839 of 2022 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶24

(Satyavrat Verma, J)

¶25

Adnan/-

¶26

U T

Santosh Kumar Mishra @ Santosh Mishra v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Santosh Kumar Mishra @ Santosh Mishra v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kundan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Indrajit Kumar @ Indrajeet Vs The State of Bihar

Amit Roy @ Guddu Roy @ Amit Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Sanjay Yadav @ Sanjay Kumar Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Phulmani Devi @ Phulmani Sah Vs The State of Bihar

Sarita Devi Vs The State of Bihar