Allowed

Ramkali Devi v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC2 Dec 2023CR. MISC./16115/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In an oral order, the Patna High Court granted regular bail to Ramkali Devi, a housewife accused in an NDPS case regarding ganja recovery, directing her release upon furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner is enlarged on bail by furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Special Judge (NDPS Act).

Ramkali Devi Vs The State of Bihar — Narcotics (NDPS) | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16115 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-286 Year-2022 Thana- SONBERSA District- Sitamarhi

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Ramkali Devi W/O Kishori Rai Resident Of Village- Indarwa, P.S.- Sonbarsa, District- Sitamarhi.

... ... Petitioner/S

Versus

The State Of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Dinesh Jha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Narendra Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER

¶9

7 02-12-2023

¶10

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

¶11

learned APP for the State .

¶12

The petitioner has filed the instant application

¶13

for grant of regular bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 8/20(b)(ii)(C)/22 of N.D.P.S. Act.

¶14

It is a case of recovery of 90 Kg Ganza from the house of co-accused Kishori Rai. Petitioner is wife of

¶15

co-accused Kishori Rai.

¶16

It is submitted by learned counsel for the

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16115 of 2023(7) dt.02-12-2023 2/3

¶18

petitioner that the petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in the present case. It is further submitted that petitioner has no concern with the seized Ganza. She is a house wife, having no concern with the affairs of her husband and her husband has also been made accused in this case and languishing in judicial custody. Provision of Cr.P.C. has not been followed in this case. Moreover, the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 25.08.2022. A statement has been made in para 3 of the petition that petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

¶19

Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for Bail.

¶20

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, petitioner being a lady as well as period of custody, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail in connection with sonbarsa P.S.

¶21

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16115 of 2023(7) dt.02-12-2023 3/3

¶22

Case No. 286 of 2022 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the

¶23

like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned

¶24

Special Judge (NDPS Act), Sitamarhi.

¶25

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J)

¶26

Nirajkrs/-

¶27

U T

Ramkali Devi v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramkali Devi v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Yashwant Kumar Singh @ Yashwant Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Pankaj Kumar Mahto Vs The State of Bihar

Mahendra Mehta @ Mahendra Pd Mehta Vs The State of Bihar

Bholi @ Rohit Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Swet Kumar @ Mahanth Shwet Dass @ Mahantha Vs The State of Bihar

Jay Karan Paswan Vs The State of Bihar