Regular bail application rejected. Court directed trial court to conclude trial within six months. Petitioner may reapply if fresh trial. No fresh grounds shown.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21953 of 2023
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-90 Year-2020 Thana- MADHEPUR District- Madhubani
======================================================
PANKAJ KUMAR MAHTO Son of Late Sukhi Pasi Resident of Village - Madhepur, P.S.- Madhepur, District - Madhubani.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Yogesh Chandra Verma, Sr. Adv. alongwith Mr. Jitendra Kumar Bharti, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ram Bilash Roy Raman, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER
4 01-12-2023
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
APP for the State.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21953 of 2023(4) dt.01-12-2023 2/2
trial within six months failing which, the petitioner will be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail.
(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J)
Arish/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether fresh grounds exist for granting regular bail in an IPC 302 trial.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Pankaj Kumar Mahto
The State of Bihar
Sunil Kumar Panwar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
